Footfall

E34C3933-1FA4-4B74-830D-FE64D8F853A2
British raider Saint Calvados wins at Naas

There was wind, rain and four meetings yesterday to choose from. At Wincanton Bryony Frost made it back to back victories for Present Man in the Badger Ales Listed Handicap Chase, while at Aintree there was as an intriguing two and half mile Hurdle as you could wish for, won by Sam Twiston Davies on Wholestone. In Scotland they raced at Kelso and in Ireland Naas opened its jumps calendar. It felt as if the National Hunt season was getting into full stride.

However, the same can’t be said for Footpad who began his campaign at Nass in the Grade 3 Poplar Square 2 mile Chase. Last season’s Arkle winner was unbeaten over fences and looked difficult to oppose, but was far from foot perfect. With mistakes at the third and sixth he continued to push the leader, but fell at the final fence, with victory going to the Harry Whittington trained, Saint Calvados. The front running five year old, who finished fourth behind Footpad in the Arkle, had been aimed at the Haldon Gold Cup last Tuesday, but like many others wasn’t declared due to the hard ground.

To take the stable star over the Irish Sea was a decision that may have been questioned by many, as there must have been suitable races closer to home, and Harry Whittington spoke of his prospects more in hope than expectation. It was a gamble that paid off and one that should be applauded.

 

God’s Own Gold Cup

 

4B594A1C-ACD3-4E8C-9EF8-851510F0DF25
The rain came a bit later than the organisers hoped for on Haldon Hill

There had been talk recently of having to abandon Devon’s top racing day due to lack of rain. It is a credit to those involved that Exeter’s Gold Cup meeting went ahead, after what must have been a few sleepless nights. Inevitably horses that had been primed for the Haldon Gold Cup for months were not declared, leaving only five to battle it out in the Grade 2 limited Handicap Chase. The rest of the card also clearly suffered, which included an uninspiring Novice Chase with only three contestants.

The net result was five winning favourites in a card of seven, three of which were odds on. The day was also made none the easier by a biting wind and the rain which eventually came; just in time for the 3.15 Handicap Chase.

However, none of this should distract from what was a great Gold Cup. This is a race with a fine tradition which has been won by some of the great chasers, including Cue Card and Best Mate, who died running the 2005 contest. Today’s contest may have lacked the biggest names, but it was a line up where a case could be made for any of the starters. Of the five, it was perhaps God’s Own who was hardest to argue for. At 10 years old and with no recent form, his best looked to be behind him. But the 2014 winner defied the year’s and got the better of Ozzie The Oscar, who had made all the running. The Philip Hobbs trained favourite looked like he could hang on, but God’s Own  found the burst of speed when it was needed and won by half a length.

Overcome by the victory, trainer Tom George said: “I think I’m more emotional about this horse winning than I have been about any other winner in my training career”. And was also quick to praise the work put in by those in his yard.

I’m undoubtedly biased about the Gold Cup: it’s the premier event at my local track. Whilst Exeter’s facilities are by no means the best and whoever thought of building a racetrack at the top of Haldon Hill, with its exposure to the elements, might have some serious questions to answer, it is one of the finest two mile Chases in the calendar. And today was no exception.

No second coming for Samcro

 

Bedrock gets the better of Samcro in the WKD Hurdle

If last year’s WKD Hurdle at Down Royal  offered some redemption for Melon, there was to be no second coming for Samcro in yesterday’s renewal. After suffering his only defeat in a fall at Punchestown in April, this was the chance to show that was a one off and vindicate the decision to keep the six year old over hurdles.

I wrote on this blog that I thought he would be sent chasing, but Gigginstown’s desire to win a Champion Hurdle and thus fill one of the few empty spaces in their trophy cabinet, might prove too great.  Having given in to that temptation could now look like an ill-judged indulgence.

Make no mistake Samcro was impressive last season and what was particularly pleasing to the eye was his ability to find an extra gear at the business end of a race. And that was precisely what he lacked yesterday. In what looked to be turning into a duel with the Willie Mullins trained Sharjah, Jack Kennedy could find nothing when he asked Samcro the question and the 12/1 Bedrock kept on well, winning with relative ease.

It could be argued the ground was too fast and he was just starting his season, whereas Bedrock was racing fit, having run all summer. Taking nothing away from Rachael Blackmore’s ride on Bedrock, the reality is if Samcro is as great as he has been hailed, he should have won this race on the bridle. There were only three other horses to beat, none of which appeared to be in the same class and Schmidt was a 100/1 outsider. Interestingly, the markets were decidedly twitchy about Samcro, who had slipped from 4/1 on to start at 9/4 on.

Gordon Elliott remained positive after the race and all the talk is of the route continuing to the Champion Hurdle at Cheltenham. But those who will be feeling particularly up beat are the ones who put money on Buveur d’Air to win his third Champion Hurdle in that window between Gigginstown declaring Samcro’s destination for the season and yesterday’s defeat.

The Velka Pardubicka

769232B0-C3B4-45D1-B11B-47021735797F
The Taxis Ditch

Having spent much of the summer sidelined with a fractured and cracked neck, one might forgive Leighton Aspinall for not choosing this season to make his debut in the Velka Pardubicka. But the jockey is clearly made of sterner stuff and lined up today with 19 others at Pardubice in the Czech Republic for the 128th running of this unique Chase.

Over its 4 miles 2 furlongs and 110 yards, horses have to run on various types of surface, including some ploughed fields, while jockeys negotiate the most eccentrically creative and challenging of obstacles. These include the Irish Bank, which horses have to shimmy up and down, two fences known as Small Gardens, which have to be jumped in frighteningly quick succession and most famous of all the Taxis Ditch. This consists of a 1.5 metre high fence followed by a 4 metre long ditch. It’s not for the faint hearted.

This year’s renewal was won  by Tzigane Du Berlais, ridden by Jan Faltejsek, making it his 5th victory in the race – I guess as there’s no other course to compare it to, experience counts for a lot.  Although a Czech, Faltejsek is much travelled and will be well known to the British, having been based for a number of years with George Charlton in Northumberland. No British jockey has won the race since Charlie Mann on It’s A Snip in 1995. But coming into the home straight Thomas Garner took the lead and looked like he might triumph on Stretton. He finished third. As for Leighton Aspinall, he fell on the first circuit. I’m sure it will take more than that to put him off returning next year.

All Hail Atholl Duncan

A77D8E67-0A4E-45B6-85F6-CE3C8F418F3B
New BHA Chair Atholl Duncan

For a man who shares his first name with a Scottish Earldom and a surname with the kindly King who met a sticky end at the hands of Macbeth, you might have expected the new BHA Chair to have been unveiled with slightly greater fanfare. However, the announcement warranted no more than a few bland paragraphs on the BHA website and just to ensure we didn’t get too excited, the headline made it clear that the appointment was only on an interim basis.

The need for a new Chair of racing’s governing body goes back to May, when it was announced Steve Harman would be stepping down in November. This followed a suggested conflict of interest that Harman had. At the time the BHA assured us that they were not at war, but presumably in an attempt to avoid the fight, it was decided Harman would step down, but not yet. Oh, and there would still be a job for him in racing.

Whilst such a compromise might look like a lesson in the art of diplomacy, the time it has taken to elect a new Chair and then to only do so on an interim basis, has more than a hint of an organisation unsure of its next move. There has been no explanation  for the delay and I can’t help thinking that Macbeth hit the nail on the head when he said “‘twere well it were done quickly”. In regard to the appointment being without a fixed term, this is justified by the BHA on the grounds that there is an ongoing ‘constructive discussion’ about the constitution of the Board and role of the Chair.

I am sure such a debate is very worthy, but the problem is that now is precisely the moment the BHA should be seen to give its leader a strong and unambiguous mandate. As well as the Tote – the downfall of Duncan’s predecessor- there’s the new limit on FOTB’s in betting shops, the proposal to limit advertising on betting products until after the watershed, racecourses on the verge of bankruptcy and, of course, let’s not forget Brexit. There are dark forces gathering.

Mr Duncan appears well qualified for his new position, but is being asked to head his troops into battles which will have to be fought on many fronts, without clarity of his authority or knowing for how long he will be in the post.

Samcro – The Second Coming?

 

3F7844E0-C8F3-4535-BC97-7D75D691F8CA
Jack Kennedy rides Samcro to victory in the Ballymore at Cheltenham

Two things happened this week to prove that the seasons are finally changing and National Hunt enthusiasts will soon be able to rouse from the tedium of a hot summer and return to basking in the mud, rain and wind of winter jump racing. The first sign the barometer had shifted was the idiosyncratic Bank Holiday meeting at Cartmel being the most valuable card of the day.  Second was The Racing Post devoting the first three pages of its Tuesday edition to jump racing stories.

Perhaps inevitably the main headline featured Samcro. The Gordon Elliot trained six year old rightly started last season with much hype and went to the Cheltenham Festival unbeaten, where he won the Ballymore with relative ease. He then ventured out of Novice company at Punchestown and fell in the Champion Hurdle. There are those who say it was just a blip or even that supernatural forces were at play in County Kildare in April – Just ask Paul Townend who inexplicably steered Al Boum Photo clear of the final fence in the Champion Novice Chase or Gordon Elliot who saw an apparent unassailable lead in the Trainers’ Championship vanish in the blink of an eye.

All this seems to have been largely forgotten and to the question “Which horse are you most excited about this season?”, which is currently doing the rounds on social media, the overwhelming answer is “Samcro”.  Meanwhile the article in the Racing Post, focused not on if  he will have a successful season, but the dilemma facing owners Gigginstown, whether to keep him over hurdles or send him chasing – If you’re interested you can get 4/9 on the first run being over hurdles and 7/4 over fences. Ruby Walsh later joined the debate saying that “Samcro looks a chaser”. For what it’s worth, I think he will go chasing: It is in the Irish psyche to run any horse that is capable of staying and jumping over fences. The counter argument is that Gigginstown who have won just about everything else in the sport are still short of a Cheltenham Champion Hurdle Trophy in the cabinet and their desire to complete the set, might be too much of a temptation.

But perhaps we’re getting carried away with ourselves.  I don’t know where Samcro gained the title  “The second coming” from and whilst I’m not saying that he’s just a very naughty boy, I do question if he flatters to deceive. He is an exquisite  looking chestnut, who has an undoubted talent to go through the gears. And there is nothing more a punter loves than to see a horse they’ve backed come from off the pace only to cruise to the front in the final furlong and humiliate the rest of the field. However, was the Irish competition really that great leading up to the Cheltenham Festival? And whilst taking nothing away from the Ballymore victory, I wasn’t convinced by his jumping, particularly over the final hurdle. Then there was the Punchestown fall, when up against the big boys.  A blip it may have been, but at the very least it has asked more questions, that it has provided answers.

I may well be proved wrong in my doubts and will quite happily admit my mistakes should he go on to be a Gold Cup winner. But, whatever the season has in store for Samcro, I’m just excited that winter isn’t far away.

 

 

 

BHA V Timothy Brennan – In defence of the BHA

I tweeted on Wednesday that I thought Tom Brennan would be cleared by the BHA’s Independent Disciplinary Panel of the allegation of conspiring to commit a corrupt or fraudulent practice. I would like to be able to say that this was a conclusion reached through careful evaluation of the evidence. It wasn’t. As a solicitor who has made a modest living from litigation for over 20 years, it was no more than whatever the lawyer’s equivalent of a copper’s hunch is.

In simple terms the case against Mr Brennan was that as Willie Mullins’ vet he was privy to information that Faugheen wouldn’t run in Cheltenham’s 2016 Champion Hurdle. There was telephone record evidence of him then making a call to his brother, Michael, following which the sibling very promptly set up a bet fair account and began laying Faugheen, who was the 1-3 favourite, at odds between 1.49 and 1.98. The waters were slightly muddied by Michael Brennan’s refusal to cooperate with the investigation, resulting in his exclusion from the sport.

On the face it this looked like a strong prima facile case; A professional who may have some influence in a yard’s decision making regarding whether a horse runs or at the very least is likely to know privileged information, evidence of contact with a third party who then lays a horse at an extremely attractive price and all within a very short period of time.

Whilst the full judgment is yet to be published, what is clear now is how quickly the BHA’s case fell apart piece by piece, in the face of Mr Brennan’s heavyweight legal team. From the reports I have read, the turning point would seem to have been the evidence of Willie Mullins who said that the decision whether to run a horse was entirely his and the limit of the inner circle to whom this would be known – the stark choice was either to accept this evidence or find he was lying.

This has all led some of the great and the good in the racing press to doubt whether the proceedings should have been instigated  at all. The Guardian’s Chris Cook, who by far gave the best coverage of the hearing, described the case as circumstantial. Tom Kerr writing in the Racing Post  questioned whether  ‘a case as thin as this should ever have been brought’ and answered that it was dubious.

Both writers are undoubtedly learned in the field of racing, but I would suggest lack an understanding of litigation. Dealing with Chris Cook first, of whom I am fan, there is nothing flawed in a prosecution  based entirely on circumstantial evidence. There have been many unquestioned high profile convictions which have relied entirely on such evidence. It is for the Tribunal to establish its weight.

Turning to Tom Kerr, his grasp of law and procedure is frankly sub GCSE standard. He writes ‘The BHA’s case was built on too many assumptions to meet the burden of proof”. What he meant was the standard of proof – the burden was on the BHA to prove  the case and the standard was on the balance of probabilities. Even allowing for his schoolboy error, this standard of proof is short of what is required in the criminal courts (beyond reasonable doubt) and I know of no standard lower than on the balance of probabilities. He made it sound as if the BHA had a high hurdle to jump evidence wise – They didn’t.

In support of his conclusion that the decision to bring the case was dubious, Kerr also points out that Panel found Brennan to be a “credible and impressive witness over several hours of cross examination”. Well the point is, you never know how strong a witness is going to be until they give their evidence and there is an opportunity to challenge it. That’s the whole reason we have hearings with live evidence. It all smacks a bit of Kerr being wise after the event.

I have not always been the biggest defender of the BHA and I’m unesay the investigation took so long to be completed and the for the matter to come before the Panel, but I would support their decision to bring the case.  It is worth noting that the Panel  found the BHA had acted reasonably in instigating the enquiry. The alternative would have been to leave a lot of unanswered questions and a lingering sense that the BHA were at best not investigating suspicions of corrupt betting practices and at worst guilty of a cover up. Justice has now been done and seen to be done.  If it hadn’t, any criticism of the BHA would have been far more justified.